To preserve the quality of the manuscript and avoid plagiarism in the publication process, the editorial board of Resilience: Journal of Psychological Science and Profession establishes the following publication ethics. These guidelines apply to authors, editors, reviewers, and journal managers.

Author Ethics

1. Report
   Authors must report the research process and results fairly, clearly, and completely to the editor, while maintaining research data securely.

2. Originality and Plagiarism
   Authors must ensure that the manuscript is original, not copied from others, and properly cites all references.

3. Resubmission
   Authors must declare that the submitted manuscript has never been published or submitted elsewhere. Any duplication may result in rejection.

4. Author Status
   Authors must confirm their expertise in the relevant field. The submitting author must act as the corresponding author to ensure communication and resolution if issues arise.

5. Errors in Manuscript Writing
   Authors must immediately notify the editor if there are errors in the manuscript and submit corrections when necessary.

6. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
   Authors must avoid conflicts of interest and ensure transparency in the publication process.

Editorial Ethics

1. Publication Decision
   Editors must ensure a fair, objective, and transparent review process before making publication decisions.

2. Publication Information
   Editors must ensure that author guidelines are clear, accessible, and understandable.

3. Peer Review Distribution
   Editors are responsible for assigning reviewers and clearly informing them of the review process.

4. Objectivity and Neutrality
   Editors must remain impartial and not discriminate based on gender, ethnicity, religion, or nationality.

5. Confidentiality
   Editors must maintain the confidentiality of author information and manuscript content.

6. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
   Editors must avoid conflicts of interest to ensure the integrity of the publication process.

Reviewer Ethics

1. Objectivity and Neutrality
   Reviewers must be objective, impartial, and uphold scientific integrity in their review.

2. Clarity of Reference Sources
   Reviewers must ensure that references are valid and reliable. Any errors must be reported to the editor.

3. Review Timeliness
   Reviewers must complete their review within the agreed timeframe (maximum 2 weeks) and notify the editor if delays are necessary.

4. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
   Reviewers must avoid conflicts of interest and respect the confidentiality of the manuscript.

Journal Management Ethics

1. Decision Making
   Journal managers must make decisions based on the journal’s mission and vision without external influence.

2. Deliberation
   Journal managers must allow editors and reviewers to work independently and respect their privacy.

3. Guarantee and Promotion
   Journal managers must protect copyright, manage third-party funds transparently, and promote published work.

4. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
   Journal managers must avoid conflicts of interest to ensure an ethical publication environment.